Gold’s death cross is no reason to feel grim
Commentary: Predictive nature of indicator has been weak lately
new
Feb. 26, 2013, 12:02 a.m. EST
By J.J. Zhang
J.J. Zhang is chemical engineer and amateur financial adviser who was
the winner in MarketWatch’s second annual World’s Next Great Investing
Columnist contest. He runs the blog MarketTech Reports. You can follow him on Twitter @MarketTechRpts.
Technical price and momentum indicators are popular tools for many
investors as a way to decide when to enter or exit positions. Recently a
popular indicator has been making the rounds on most financial sites
due to gold hitting the “death cross.” So what is a death cross?
The definition of a death cross can vary depending on who you ask but
generally it refers to the 50-day moving average crossing under the
200-day moving average. A common condition added to this definition is
that the 200-day moving average must also be on a downward trend.
Generally this is seen as a bearish sign and is supposed to indicate
that the market has a negative outlook on the future of gold prices.
So with gold entering a death cross, you have to ask: how useful is this
indicator? While many technicians do use other indicators in
combination with the death cross to get a better feel of market
direction, it’s still an interesting statistical exercise to look
through historical data.
After all, how often do death crosses and their opposite, the golden
crosses, occur? What is the typical price performance a week, a month, a
quarter and a half year after? Do they actually predict longer term
market deterioration?
The first question of death cross frequency is a relatively simple one
to answer using historical data. Using gold spot price available from
the World Gold Council at Gold.org, an analysis found the commodity
metal has seen 37 total 50/200-day moving average crossovers (including
last week) since 1979.
That works out to 19 death crosses and 18 golden crosses at roughly 1 crossover per year.
The tables below list each death and golden cross occurrence along with
the number of trading days each period and the percent change after one
week, one month, three months, six months and until the crossover
reverses (by definition, a golden cross always occurs after each death
cross and vice versa).
Death cross performance since 1979
Death cross | Trading days lasted | % change after 1 week | % change after 1 month | % change after 3 months | % change after 6 months | % change ar reversal |
Feb. 20, 2013 | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
April 13,2012 | 113 | -1.5 | -6.5 | -4.3 | 4.2* | 6.2 |
Feb. 10, 2012 | 10 | 0.7 | -0.8* | -6.6* | -5.4* | 3.8 |
Sept. 1, 2008 | 116 | -1.7 | 7.0 | -5.4 | 14.0* | 8.9 |
Oct. 19, 2006 | 43 | -0.2 | 4.7 | 5.4* | 14.2* | 2.8 |
May 30, 2005 | 56 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 3.0* | 18.5* | 6.0 |
June 4, 2004 | 85 | -0.9 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 16.7* | 7.0 |
May 3, 2000 | 290 | 0.7 | 2.8 | -0.1 | -4.0 | -2.1 |
Dec. 14, 1998 | 221 | -0.6 | -2.0 | -0.6 | -10.7 | 6.9 |
June 12, 1996 | 642 | 0.4 | -0.3 | -0.7 | -4.2 | -23.0 |
Sept. 27, 1995 | 66 | -0.3 | -0.3 | 0.9 | 4.3* | 0.9 |
Dec. 16, 1994 | 90 | 0.3 | -0.7 | 0.9 | 2.9* | 3.4 |
Oct. 2, 1992 | 155 | 0.6 | -2.4 | -5.7 | -2.3 | 2.2 |
Jan. 30, 1992 | 157 | 0.0 | -1.6 | -5.5 | 0.2 | -3.9 |
Feb. 27, 1991 | 202 | 1.7 | -1.7 | -1.2 | -1.7 | 1.3 |
May 1, 1990 | 104 | 0.3 | -1.6 | 0.3 | 2.9* | 5.4 |
March 2, 1988 | 452 | 1.8 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 0,.0 | -4.4 |
Aprl 29, 1983 | 588 | 0.5 | 1.9 | -1.7 | -11.0 | -24.2 |
Jan. 7, 1981 | 432 | -0.6 | -10.8 | -12.5 | -30.8 | -20.8 |
Avg.-total | 212 | 0.2 | 0.1 | -1.3 | 0.4 | -1.3 |
Median-total | 136 | 0.3 | -0.5 | -0.7 | 0.1 | 2.5 |
Avg. last 10 years | 71 | -0.3 | 1.9 | -0.8 | 10.4 | 5.8 |
Median last 10 years | 71 | -0.6 | 3,.6 | -0.7 | 14.1 | 6.1 |
* indicates after reversal
For death crosses, the average length is 212 trading days while the
median length is only 135, indicating a few occurrences’ lasted
unusually long. Within the last 10 years, the average has only been 71
days, a significantly shorter length.
In fact, none have lasted six months or longer since 2000. If the
pattern holds, the current death cross may only last 3 months.
Continued from page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Surprisingly, the average change after a death cross at the one-week and
one-month marker is just barely positive at 0.2% and 0.1% respectively.
The three-month performance shows a small drop at -1.3% while the
six-month performance is positive at 0.4%.
However, this result is driven heavily by the last 10 years. Because
each death cross lasted for such a short period, most of the three- and
six-month data include a significant amount of time where gold was in a
golden cross bull market.
Pre-2004, gold generally saw a long-term deterioration in market price
after a death cross, averaging -4.5% after six months. In comparison,
post-2004, gold averaged a 10% gain six months after a death cross and
6% by the time the cross had reversed.
This indicates recent death crosses don’t signal much regarding the
longer term market outlook for gold. While continuing to assume this
trend can be dangerous, nonetheless, it shows gold’s relative robustness
in today’s market.
Golden cross performance since 1979
Golden cross | Trading days lasted | % change after 1 week | % change after 1 month | % change after 3 months | % change after 6 months | % change at reversal |
Sept. 19, 2012 | 111 | -1.3 | -1.7 | -5.8 | TBD | -9.0 |
Feb. 14, 2012 | 35 | -4.0 | -5.5 | -11.8* | -6.2* | -6.1 |
Feb 10, 2009 | 783 | 6.4 | -0.9 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 92.0 |
Dec. 19, 2006 | 444 | 0.0 | -0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | -0.6 |
Aug. 16, 2005 | 307 | -0.8 | 3.2 | 7.4 | 21.6 | 34.1 |
Oct. 1, 2004 | 171 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.1 |
June 13, 20001 | 777 | -0.2 | -2.1 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 43.5 |
Oct. 19, 1999 | 141 | -4.2 | -5.1 | -7.1 | -9.1 | -11.0 |
Nov. 27, 1998 | 11 | -1.3 | -3.5* | -3.2* | -9.2* | -1.8 |
Dec. 28, 1995 | 119 | 1.9 | 4.5 | 3.0 | -1.3* | -0.5 |
April 21, 1995 | 113 | -0.2 | -2.3 | -1.1 | -2.0* | -1.7 |
May 7, 1993 | 420 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 6.8 | 5.1 | 6.1 |
Sept. 7, 1992 | 19 | 1.0 | 2.1* | -2.4* | -4.5* | 1.6 |
Dec. 6, 1991 | 39 | -2.4 | -5.0 | -5.0* | -7.9* | -3.5 |
Sept. 24, 1990 | 112 | 1.0 | -5.5 | -2.2 | -8.5* | -8.5 |
Nov. 24, 1989 | 113 | -0.5 | -0.7 | -1.1 | -11.9* | -11.6 |
July 31, 1985 | 675 | -1.9 | 2.2 | -0.7 | 7.0 | 31.1 |
Sept. 6, 1982 | 169 | -7.4 | -14.7 | -4.1 | -11.2 | -9.6 |
Avg. --total | 253 | -0.6 | -1.6 | -1.1 | -1.8 | 8.0 |
Median- total | 130 | -0.4 | -1.3 | -1.1 | -2.0 | -1.2 |
Avg. - last 10 years | 309 | 0.2 | -0.5 | -0.9 | 4.3 | 18.4 |
Median- last 10 years | 239 | -0.4 | -0.9 | 0.4 | 2.2 | -0.3 |
* indicates after reversal
For golden crosses, the average and median length is similar at 253 and
130 days. However, the last 10 years averaged a length of 308 trading
days, showing just how strong the recent gold bull market has been.
Similar to how the one-week and one-month performance
counter-intuitively went up after a death cross, average one-week and
one-month performance dropped after a golden cross at -0.6% and -1.6%
respectively.
Surprisingly, average three-month and six-month performances were also
negative after a golden cross at -1.1% and -1.8%, contradicting the
popular notion that golden crosses signal a bull market. However, due to
the long period of each crossover event, gold eventually returned 8% on
average by the time a golden cross reversed into a death cross.
Like death crosses, the last 10 years for golden crosses also show a
significant deviation versus pre-2004 trends, instead displaying a
strong positive gain at six-months.
Overall, a simple analysis of death and golden crosses since 1979,
ignoring the more nuanced interpretations and other technical
indicators, indicate relatively poor long-term market predictability for
gold. While death crosses were relatively good indicators pre-2004,
recent death crosses generally are short lived and prices recovered soon
after.
Golden crosses are also an overall poor indicator though the long gold
bull market in recent years has helped the correlation. Whether that
counts as a predictive indicator is debatable however.
In the end, while death and golden crosses sound important; don’t get
too worried about them — there’s much more in the financial markets to
be concerned about.
Note: For more statistics and graphs from this study, please visit my blog, linked above.
No comments:
Post a Comment