http://www.marketwatch.com/story/banks-told-by-fed-to-test-for-12-unemployment-2012-11-15?link=MW_home_latest_news
Nov. 15, 2012, 5:05 p.m. EST
Banks told by Fed to test for 12% unemployment
Stories You Might Like
new
By Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The Federal Reserve is asking 30 big banks to
make sure their capital can withstand a deep recession in which the
unemployment rate rises to 12%.
The Fed, which first required big banks to conduct “stress tests” in
2009, laid out three scenarios lenders have to test against. The goal is
to ensure that the firms have enough capital to continue operations
during stressful economic times.
ECONOMY AND POLITICS |
Follow
@MKTWEconomics
• Complete coverage of fiscal cliff crisis
• Millionaire tax may be on table for House GOP
• Small-biz owners worried about cliff, workers
• Obama open to tax ideas, but firm on the rich
• Nutting: Stop calling it a 'fiscal cliff'
• Bernanke: Mortgage lending rules too tight
• Sandy causes surge in jobless claims
• Northeast factories slammed by Sandy
• Consumer prices inch up in October
• Complete coverage of fiscal cliff crisis
• Millionaire tax may be on table for House GOP
• Small-biz owners worried about cliff, workers
• Obama open to tax ideas, but firm on the rich
• Nutting: Stop calling it a 'fiscal cliff'
• Bernanke: Mortgage lending rules too tight
• Sandy causes surge in jobless claims
• Northeast factories slammed by Sandy
• Consumer prices inch up in October
The Fed stressed they were not making economic forecasts “but rather
hypothetical scenarios designed to assess the strength of financial
institutions in stressful economic environments.”
In addition to considering an unemployment rate of roughly 12% — up from
7.9% in October — in the most severe recession scenario, banks must
evaluate how their capital buffers would withstand real GDP declining by
around 5%.
Banks will also have to test for equity prices that would fall by more
than 50% over the course of the recession, with house prices declining
more than 20% and with commercial real estate prices falling by a
similar amount.
While harsh, the Fed stress test isn’t necessarily as bad as conditions
actually were during the so-called Great Recession from late 2007 to
2009. The unemployment rate rose from 4.7% before the recession started
in Nov. 2007 to as high as 10%, the economy shrank as much as 8.9%
during one quarter, and home prices have tumbled by roughly a third from
their peak.
The 30 largest U.S. financial institutions will be required to submit capital plans to the Federal Reserve by Jan. 7.
The Fed said that 19 of the largest banks under review have hiked their
common capital to $803 billion in the second quarter of 2012 from $420
billion in the first quarter of 2009.
The Fed uses the stress tests to decide whether to allow banks to issue
dividends and implement stock buybacks. Under the process banks tell the
Fed what dividends and stock buybacks they want to issue. For the first
time, the Fed will allow banks to modify these proposals while they
discuss the ongoing stress tests with the central bank.
The new guidance comes after Ally Financial Inc., Citigroup Inc.
C
+0.54%
, MetLife Inc.
MET
+1.39%
and SunTrust Banks Inc.
STI
+1.49%
initially failed to have enough capital under a stress test conducted
on 19 big banks by the Federal Reserve in March. It was one of the
reasons cited by observers as to why Vikram Pandit was pushed out of his
role as head of Citi.
Read commentary on Pandit’s exit.
In addition, two other bank regulators, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corp. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, both also
agreed to conduct stress tests on some large institutions under their
oversight using the scenarios. Cumulatively, more than 100 large
financial institutions that each have more than $10 billion in capital
will conduct stress tests.
The regulators also clarified guidance that community banks with under
$10 billion in assets are not required to conduct the types of stress
testing required by big banks.
Ronald D. Orol is a MarketWatch reporter, based in Washington.
No comments:
Post a Comment