Wednesday, 30 January 2013

 The Blackberry Experience

http://tremolo.edgesuite.net/blackberry_experience_launch/desktop_dvr/index.html


Jan. 30, 2013, 11:22 a.m. EST

BlackBerry Z10 to roll out to U.S. in March


By Dan Gallagher 

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Research In Motion Ltd. RIMM -5.49% said Wednesday that it expects its new BlackBerry Z10 smartphone to roll out to U.S. carriers "sometime in March," with the touch-screen device coming to the U.K. and Canada first. The company said at a launch event on Wednesday that AT&T T +0.23% , Verizon VZ +0.82% , Sprint S +0.44% and T-Mobile will all carry the device. No specific prices were given at the event, and launch details were not available for the Q10 device that uses a QWERTY keyboard. RIM shares were down more than 5% to $14.85 as the event wrapped up. 

Is Facebook growing fast enough?

Commentary: Questions to ask when company releases its earnings

By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (MarketWatch) — Facebook’s revenues are growing at a fast pace. But they aren’t growing fast enough to support their current stock price.
Facebook FB +1.77% , of course, is scheduled to release its latest quarterly earnings report after the close on Wednesday. The consensus forecast from Wall Street analysts, according to FactSet, is for the social-media company to report quarterly earnings totalling $1.5 billion. That would mean that, for all of last year, Facebook’s revenue would be $5.0 billion.
That’s a big number, for sure, and certainly seems impressive.
To understand why I nevertheless believe that it’s not good enough, it’s helpful to review a back-of-the-envelope calculation of Facebook’s valuation that I introduced in a column immediately after the company went public last May at $38 per share.

Does Facebook have its mojo back?

Facebook shares are up sharply after Raymond James upgrades the stock based on signs of solid growth in its mobile ad business. Photo: Getty Images.
That calculation required just three inputs:
  • Facebook’s revenue growth rate over its first five years as a publicly traded company. I assumed that it would be the same as the average of all U.S. IPOs between 1996 and 2005 — 212% cumulatively, or 25.6% on an annualized basis (after excluding spinoffs and buyouts).
  • Facebook’s price-to-sales ratio in five years’ time. I assumed it would be the same as Google’s is today GOOG +0.33%  — which is a quite generous assumption, since Google’s price-to-sales ratio is nearly four times larger than the overall market’s.
  • The rate of return Facebook investors would require to hold the stock for the five years after its IPO. Generously, I assumed the market’s long-term average return of 11%. If I had assumed a higher return number, then the outcome of my analysis would have been an even lower fair value today.
Armed with these three otherwise generous inputs, calculating a fair price for Facebook was a matter of simple math: As I reported last May, that price was $13.80. ( Read my May 25, 2012, column: “Facebook’s stock should trade for $13.80” ).
How can Facebook overcome this awful fate? Since investors won’t be happy earning less than 11% per year, and since it’s unreasonable to expect the company’s price-to-sales ratio in 2017 to be markedly higher than Google’s is today, the only realistic way for Facebook to overcome my dismal price target is for its revenue growth rate to be far higher than 25.6% per year through 2016.
Yet the company has not shown that it can maintain this much higher revenue growth rate.
To be sure, it might on the surface seem otherwise. Provided the consensus estimate is correct, for example, the company’s 2012 revenues will have been 35.5% higher than in 2011.
But, according to Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida who is one of academia’s leading experts on IPOs, the typical pattern is for a post-IPO company’s revenue growth rate to decline over its first several years after going public.
To average 25.6% over its first five years after coming to market, therefore, a company’s revenue growth in its first couple of years needs to be above that rate.
Consider, for instance, the average revenue growth rate over the first three years after a company comes to market. According to Ritter, this three-year growth rate was 36.7% per year for the same sample of IPOs that produced a five-year annualized growth rate of 25.6%.
So Facebook’s revenue growth over this past year is almost precisely in line with the rate that was the basis of my back-of-the-envelope calculation.
How, then, is Wall Street able to persuade itself that Facebook should be trading at its currently high price? As far as I can tell, by assuming Facebook deserves to have a sky-high price-to-sales ratio — not just now, but also well into the future.
Consider, according to FactSet, the consensus estimate of Facebook’s revenues in calendar 2015 — the furthest year out for which a consensus estimate is provided. That consensus is $10.5 billion.
Assuming that consensus is on target, and assuming Facebook’s price-to-sales ratio in 2015 will be the same as Google’s is today, then Facebook’s market cap at the end of 2015 would be around $52 billion. That’s 25% lower than where the company’s market cap stands today.
Don’t like the conclusions of my calculations? Be my guest and go through the exercise yourself, employing any of the standard valuation metrics. And use your calculations to subject Facebook’s latest quarterly earnings report to a smell test.
My hunch is that if you do so, you will not be running out to buy Facebook stock afterward.
Mark Hulbert is the founder of Hulbert Financial Digest in Annandale, Va. He has been tracking the advice of more than 160 financial newsletters since 1980. Follow him on Twitter @MktwHulbert.

Is this the biggest triple top ever?

About John Nyaradi

 John Nyaradi is Publisher of Wall Street Sector Selector, a financial media site focused on news, analysis and information about exchange traded funds and global financial and economic developments.
John's investment articles have appeared in many online publications including MarketWatch, Trading Markets, Money Show, Yahoo Finance, Investors Insight, Fidelity, ETF Daily News, iStock Analyst and his interviews have appeared on MarketWatch, Yahoo Finance's Breakout, National Business Talk Radio, Sound Investing, and The Index Investing Show. His book, "Super Sectors: How to Outsmart the Market Using Sector Rotation and ETFs", is included among the Years Top Investment Books in the 2011 Stock Trader’s Almanac.
The trading deck is powered by
By John Nyaradi
As the S&P 500 challenges new all-time highs, it approaches significant resistance levels that represent a major turning point in U.S. stock market history.
The chart below depicts the trading activity in the S&P 500 Large-Cap Index during the past 20 years. The most obvious pattern is that our recent arrival at the psychologically important level of 1,500 is our third attempt at testing that overhead limit.
We have been here twice before, in 2000 and 2007, and both times the S&P failed to make a sustained breakout above that level. On both occasions, significant bear market declines ensued shortly thereafter.
In 2000, the S&P 500 peaked at approximately 1,522 in March of 2000. By October of 2002, it had fallen to a low of 768 for a decline of approximately 50% in the bear-market decline we now call the "tech wreck."
In October of 2007, the S&P 500 peaked at 1,565 before falling to the Hadean low of 666 in March of 2008. That bear-market decline, which we now know as the Great Recession, resulted in a 50% retracement from the October 2007 high.
So now we're back at this critical level and the big question is, "Will history repeat or rhyme, or will the market be able to move higher this time?"
Taking a closer look at the two previous peaks, we see that they were actually head-and-shoulders patterns, where the "heads" were comprised of double-tops. If the exact pattern were to repeat, we could expect a double-top forming at the current level, progressing down for a brief bump, to form a right shoulder, which, if completed, could lead to another significant decline in the S&P 500.
As we compare "then" to "now," it's important to note both similarities and differences between these three occasions.
The declines of 2002 and 2008 were the result of extreme historic events, the popping of the Nasdaq bubble in 2000 and financial crisis of 2008. Similar catalysts that could trigger a major decline today could be the upcoming "Fiscal Cliff, Part 2" or the budget-ceiling debate now postponed for later this spring. For now, both situations appear to be suspended but will still need to be dealt with before we can firmly say that their threat has passed. Other potential headwinds are the recessions in Europe and Japan which could spread to a global recession and slower U.S. profits and domestic economic growth.
Today, the S&P 500 and other major U.S. stock indexes remain overbought and at significant resistance levels. One could expect some sideways action from here or a correction down to support levels that lie between 1450-1470 on the S&P 500.
After that process is complete, and barring any external shock like a stumble on Capitol Hill, we can expect the S&P 500 to make another run at new, nominal all-time highs. If that breakout is successful, the ongoing uptrend can continue on the back of easy monetary policy and relatively positive corporate profits and economic news.
However, if the S&P 500 and other major U.S. indexes are turned back at today's critical, even historic, juncture, we could see a significant upcoming decline in the U.S. stock market as history repeats and also rhymes. For today, Wall Street Sector Selector remains in "green flag" status, expecting higher prices ahead.

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Category:Shoe companies of China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
Jump to: navigation, search

Pages in category "Shoe companies of China"

The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more).

Monday, 28 January 2013


Krispy Kreme Adopts Poison Pill to Ward Off Potential


Paul Chinn/San Francisco Chronicle/Corbis
Freshly-baked doughnuts are glazed on National Doughnut Day at a Krispy Kreme in Daly City, California. 
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc. (KKD), whose shares have jumped this year amid speculation it’s an acquisition target, adopted measures to discourage investors from buying 5 percent or more of the company’s stock.
The plan is meant to protect against an inadvertent change of ownership, which would limit the way the company’s previous operating losses and other credits could be applied to future taxes, Krispy Kreme said in a statement today. The company said it had about $240 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards as of January 2012.
Krispy Kreme has become a potential takeover target since Chief Executive Officer James Morgan boosted sales with an expanded menu that includes such healthier items as oatmeal, fruit juice and smoothies. The shares had gained 26 percent this year through yesterday. Today, they fell 3.2 percent to $11.44 at the close in New York, the biggest drop since Nov. 27.
The plan announced today, which would dilute the stake of potential acquirers, amounts to a so-called poison pill to help protect against takeovers, Conrad Lyon, an analyst at B. Riley & Co., said in a telephone interview today.
Besides helping prevent a takeover, the plan is also designed to protect Krispy Kreme’s net operating loss, said Lyon, who is based in Los Angeles.
Krispy Kreme, founded in 1937, said there’s no guarantee that the plan will avoid an ownership change and the company may pursue other means to prevent such an occurrence.
After falling victim to headlong expansion and America’s obsession with low-carb diets, the chain’s quarterly sales have risen for more than two years.
Sales may increase 7.6 percent to $434 million in the fiscal year ending this month, which would be the highest since fiscal 2007, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s larger than the revenue increases forecast for Dunkin’ Brands and McDonald’s Corp. in 2012, the data show.
To contact the reporters on this story: James Callan in New York at jcallan2@bloomberg.net; Leslie Patton in Chicago at lpatton5@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Robin Ajello at rajello@bloomberg.net

Apple estimates still a problem, analysts say

Projections may set up iPhone maker’s stock for further losses

By Dan Gallagher, MarketWatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Already heavily battered by fears of an iPhone slowdown following last week’s results, shares of Apple Inc. could be in for even more downside given high estimates on Wall Street, analysts warned on Monday.

Reuters
Apple CEO Tim Cook.
Two brokers issued notes to clients before trading opened on Monday, warning that current consensus projections for the latter part of 2013 may still be too high — despite the fact that most analysts covering the stock slashed their forecasts following the company’s earnings results last week. Those estimates could set up more declines for a stock that lost 14% last week alone and has plunged more than 35% from its peak in late September.
Apple’s AAPL +2.62%  shares shrugged off the warnings in early Monday trades, with the stock gaining 2.3% to $450.20.
The company issued its report for its first fiscal quarter ended Dec. 29 on Wednesday afternoon last week. While earnings were flat for the period, revenue fell slightly below analysts’ forecasts. 


Apple also told analysts that it was changing its practice on giving guidance, saying it now plans “to provide a range of guidance that reflect our belief of what we are likely to achieve,” as opposed to its highly conservative approach in past periods. Read: Apple shares tumble on results, forecast
“In essence, Apple executives were saying, ‘we are no longer going to provide low-ball guidance that we are going to crush; this guidance range is realistic, get in line,’ which sell-siders largely did, albeit at the high end of the range,” wrote Toni Sacconaghi of Bernstein Research in a note to clients on Monday.
Sacconaghi says the problem remains for the second half of Apple’s fiscal year — particularly the June quarter. He notes that Wall Street’s consensus is predicting a 1% sequential decline in iPhone sales for the June period, “which is historically unprecedented in the absence of a new device — which we would not hold our breath for (at least at this point).”
High estimates for the June quarter posed an even bigger problem for Will Power of Robert W. Baird, who downgraded Apple’s stock to a neutral rating on Monday, citing in part estimates that “we believe remain frustratingly too high.” He lowered his price target to $465 from $570.

Has Mayer turned Yahoo around?

Yahoo reports after the bell on Monday and investors are looking for signs of a turn-around. Rolfe Winkler discusses on Markets Hub.
“We believe the company could be set up to miss June consensus when it reports March-quarter results,” Power wrote.
For the June quarter, the third period of Apple’s fiscal year, Wall Street is currently projecting earnings of $9.88 per share on revenue of $41.2 billion, having reported earnings of $9.32 per share on revenue of $35 billion for the same period last year.
Of Apple’s business, Power added that “while concerned with many of the stock/estimate dynamics over the near to medium term, we remain positive on Apple’s unmatched ecosystem, product portfolio, the likelihood for future innovation, and its balance sheet and cash generation.”
Dan Gallagher is MarketWatch's technology editor, based in San Francisco. Follow him on Twitter @MWDanGallagher.

10 most counterfeited products in America

 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-most-counterfeited-products-in-america-2013-01-28?siteid=bigcharts&dist=bigcharts