Wednesday, 5 December 2012

Apple is starting to falter, as expected

About Thomas H. Kee Jr.

Thomas H. Kee Jr. is the president and CEO of Stock Traders Daily (dotcom), where he offers strategies and newsletters to both institutional and individual investors, and he manages money privately for both institutional and individual investors through Equity Logic LLC. A specialist in technical analysis, Kee is also the founder of one of the leading, longer-term fundamental economic and stock market indicators in history, The Investment Rate. This proprietary tool, which is available to clients, too, predicts major economic cycles well in advance, and has been accurate since 1900. Using his broader observations of the economy to define disciplines, Kee has been able to accurately predict market cycles in advance using his multi-tiered technical indicators, and that combination has kept him ahead of the curve since starting Stock Traders Daily in January 2000.
The trading deck is powered by
By Thomas H. Kee Jr.
At the end of the first quarter of 2012, I warned that Apple may be reaching its pinnacle-point as a business. Since then, there have been warning signs, too, some top executives departed from the company, and recently I heard something much more tangible to the earnings growth that persisted throughout the year thus far.
In the first quarter, I warned that Apple was not treating its customers right, they were gouging the service providers like Verizon, Sprint and AT&T, and although that looks great to the bottom line and margins initially, it also creates a divide that can become pronounced when retail items become less favored.
My key point in the first quarter was that consumers are also fickle, products move in and out of favor regularly, trends can turn from popular to unpopular overnight, and if the situation presents itself where the divide mentioned above occurs at the same time a product starts to lose its momentum, serious problems could follow. That can lead to changes in analyst opinions and impact stock price as we know.
Specifically, in situations like the one mentioned above margins could come under even more severe pressure that what would be normal because the retailers (service providers) will promote products that afford them a better return and skew the percentage of sales even more than might otherwise occur. This is the way of business. Companies attempt to earn the most they can, it is simple capitalism, and this is part of the problem I foresaw after the first quarter of this year.
Furthermore, as the year continued, the competition — Motorola and Samsung specifically — have caught up and in many cases surpassed Apple. If nothing more, competition has become fierce, so I have recently begun to investigate using a "Random Walk" approach. I have been visiting retailers and asking a simple question: Are you selling as many iPhones as you did before?
Resoundingly, the answer starts the same way: “We sell a ton of iPhones.” However, as I dig a little deeper, I also discover that the proportion of sales are changing meaningfully. I have learned that the percentages are changing from what used to be 75% iPhone/25% others, to 60% iPhone/40% others. Others obviously include the Droid and other phones using Google's operating systems, and Blackberrys by Research in Motion, but I did not go into detail about the percentages of the others.
Whether consumers are buying a lower price-point was unclear, but it sounded as if the level of spend was the same, but they were just opting for something other than iPhones more often. In my opinion, this defines a loss in momentum for the iPhone, which is the foundation of Apple's earnings and revenue, and margins too of course. The competition has caught up with Apple, I warned about this in the first quarter, and we are seeing it unfold in front of our eyes now.
Beware of a company that has a divide with its retailers, especially when their products lose momentum. What might otherwise be a slight reduction in margins could become much worse if the retailers start to push other products more aggressively.
Although I pulled the short I had on AAPL off when the stock broke above $640, we transitioned to the two-times-short on the Nasdaq 100 QID +1.45% , which is largely influenced by AAPL, and that position is up about 10% since then. We continue to hold this position amongst others.
I am not saying that Apple will stop selling iPhones, IPads or anything else. I also expect them to sell quite a bit, and I expect the loyal followers of Apple products to keep buying as much as they can, but the momentum has shifted, I feel that Apple products are no longer cutting edge, and unless that changes, margin pressure can cause earnings and revenue to slow considerably and multiples to contract.
Disclosure: Mr. Kee is long QID for selected portfolios.

No comments:

Post a Comment