Tuesday, 9 December 2014
Tuesday, 2 December 2014
China: Follow The Money!
http://www.kitco.com/ind/Schmidt/2014-11-26-China-Follow-The-Money.html
On morning of 17 November, while Western investors were sleeping, China opened the door to its investment world. On that day China began two-way trading between the Shanghai and Hong Kong stock exchanges. This development essentially opened the Chinese stock market to investors around the world through Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect. They said to investors around the world, “Welcome, just bring your money and come right in.”
Investors would be well advised to be aware of the money flowing into the Chinese stock market, and possible ramifications of that money movement.
Money is like water flowing across the earth, it fills in the low spot. To foreign investors, and in particular dollar-based institutional funds, the Chinese stock market is a “low spot” to be filled in with money. Foreign investors will fill that “low spot” with their money. Institutional money managers cannot ignore the most important economy in the world, and one destined to be the largest. As the chart at right portrays, the cumulative dollar flow into China’s stock market is off to a good start. At present the daily limitation on investment money inflow is 13 billion Yuan, or roughly $2.1 billion, per day. Actual money flows have been below that limit, but it is just the first week of the rest of time. Note especially that we only have a week of data, and the discussion that follows is about trends that will unfold over time.
In order to buy Chinese stocks one must have Renminbi to pay for them. To a dollar-based investor that means selling dollars and buying Renminbi. Those transactions should put downward pressure on the dollar and upward pressure on the Renminbi. While a myriad of factors will influence the value of the Renminbi, this money flow, which will be massive over time, will contribute to the secular uptrend in value of Chinese Renminbi already in place. Second chart above portrays the cumulative money flows into Chinese stock market with dollar value of the Renminbi. As that black line is rising, the Chinese currency is appreciating and the dollar is depreciating. While our focus here is on the dollar, other currencies, such as the Euro and yen for example, will come under similar selling pressure.
As money flows out of dollars and other currencies, the value of Gold in those currencies should rise. In the chart to the right is plotted the cumulative flow of money into Chinese stock versus price of US$Gold.
Another question that arises is from where will this money come. Near all the money flowing into Chinese stocks will come from institutional funds of all kinds, especially U.S. based speculative funds. While we know not from where in their portfolios money for purchases of Chinese stocks will come, one clear candidate for a money source is the NASDAQ traded issues. Many of those stocks are over owned in institutional portfolios. In the bottom chart is plotted again the cumulative money flow into Chinese stocks verus the NASDAQ Composite Index, left axis.
In reviewing this situation several possible strategies present themselves for consideration by investors. With a money flow over coming years into Chinese stocks that will be measured in the hundreds of billions of dollar, buying Chinese stocks is clearly one possibility. For a variety of reasons, this approach may not fit many individual investors. Hong Kong exchange may be more viable and friendly route.
Second, consideration should be given to investing in the Chinese Renminbi as it is likely to rise in value versus your home currency. Most desirable route is through a Renminbi denominated bank deposit. These accounts are available through many banks around the world and on the internet. In U.S. banks those deposits are insured. Exchange Traded Currencies (ETCs), a form of ETF, are also available. However, investors should probably avoid Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs).
A third alternative should be obvious from the above discussion. Gold is a form of currency that moves opposite the value of national currencies. Dollar and most other national currencies should depreciate versus the Chinese Renminbi. That action should add support to the value of Gold in those currencies. For many, this investment route may be more comfortable than the previous two.
Finally, note that the above prognostications are the future, a time period measured in years. They are not forecasts of what might happen tomorrow afternoon. We prefer you become wealthier over time rather than feed the hope for one lucky trade.
Ned Schmidt, CFA
www.valueviewgoldreport.com
Follow us @vvgoldreport
Wednesday November 26, 2014 15:10
On morning of 17 November, while Western investors were sleeping, China opened the door to its investment world. On that day China began two-way trading between the Shanghai and Hong Kong stock exchanges. This development essentially opened the Chinese stock market to investors around the world through Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect. They said to investors around the world, “Welcome, just bring your money and come right in.”
Investors would be well advised to be aware of the money flowing into the Chinese stock market, and possible ramifications of that money movement.
Money is like water flowing across the earth, it fills in the low spot. To foreign investors, and in particular dollar-based institutional funds, the Chinese stock market is a “low spot” to be filled in with money. Foreign investors will fill that “low spot” with their money. Institutional money managers cannot ignore the most important economy in the world, and one destined to be the largest. As the chart at right portrays, the cumulative dollar flow into China’s stock market is off to a good start. At present the daily limitation on investment money inflow is 13 billion Yuan, or roughly $2.1 billion, per day. Actual money flows have been below that limit, but it is just the first week of the rest of time. Note especially that we only have a week of data, and the discussion that follows is about trends that will unfold over time.
In order to buy Chinese stocks one must have Renminbi to pay for them. To a dollar-based investor that means selling dollars and buying Renminbi. Those transactions should put downward pressure on the dollar and upward pressure on the Renminbi. While a myriad of factors will influence the value of the Renminbi, this money flow, which will be massive over time, will contribute to the secular uptrend in value of Chinese Renminbi already in place. Second chart above portrays the cumulative money flows into Chinese stock market with dollar value of the Renminbi. As that black line is rising, the Chinese currency is appreciating and the dollar is depreciating. While our focus here is on the dollar, other currencies, such as the Euro and yen for example, will come under similar selling pressure.
As money flows out of dollars and other currencies, the value of Gold in those currencies should rise. In the chart to the right is plotted the cumulative flow of money into Chinese stock versus price of US$Gold.
Another question that arises is from where will this money come. Near all the money flowing into Chinese stocks will come from institutional funds of all kinds, especially U.S. based speculative funds. While we know not from where in their portfolios money for purchases of Chinese stocks will come, one clear candidate for a money source is the NASDAQ traded issues. Many of those stocks are over owned in institutional portfolios. In the bottom chart is plotted again the cumulative money flow into Chinese stocks verus the NASDAQ Composite Index, left axis.
In reviewing this situation several possible strategies present themselves for consideration by investors. With a money flow over coming years into Chinese stocks that will be measured in the hundreds of billions of dollar, buying Chinese stocks is clearly one possibility. For a variety of reasons, this approach may not fit many individual investors. Hong Kong exchange may be more viable and friendly route.
Second, consideration should be given to investing in the Chinese Renminbi as it is likely to rise in value versus your home currency. Most desirable route is through a Renminbi denominated bank deposit. These accounts are available through many banks around the world and on the internet. In U.S. banks those deposits are insured. Exchange Traded Currencies (ETCs), a form of ETF, are also available. However, investors should probably avoid Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs).
A third alternative should be obvious from the above discussion. Gold is a form of currency that moves opposite the value of national currencies. Dollar and most other national currencies should depreciate versus the Chinese Renminbi. That action should add support to the value of Gold in those currencies. For many, this investment route may be more comfortable than the previous two.
Finally, note that the above prognostications are the future, a time period measured in years. They are not forecasts of what might happen tomorrow afternoon. We prefer you become wealthier over time rather than feed the hope for one lucky trade.
Ned Schmidt, CFA
www.valueviewgoldreport.com
Follow us @vvgoldreport
Sunday, 2 November 2014
Sunday, 12 October 2014
World Bank Cuts Developing East Asia 2015 GDP Forecast
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-06/world-bank-cuts-developing-east-asia-2015-gdp-forecast.html
World Bank Cuts Developing East Asia 2015 GDP Forecast
Related
The World Bank lowered its forecasts for growth in developing East
Asia this year and next as China’s expansion moderates and policy makers
brace for tighter global monetary conditions.
The region is forecast to grow 6.9 percent in 2014 and 2015, down from 7.1 percent projected in April, the Washington-based lender said in its East Asia and Pacific Economic Update released today. China will expand 7.4 percent this year and 7.2 percent next year, compared with 7.6 percent and 7.5 percent previously forecast, the report showed.
Data released last month showed China’s industrial-output expansion at its weakest since the global financial crisis, while moderating investment and retail sales growth underscore the risks of a deepening economic slowdown led by a slumping property market. Significant uncertainties remain that could affect the region’s growth including downside risks in the euro area and Japan, a sharp tightening in global financial conditions and international and regional geopolitical tensions, the World Bank said.
“The best way for countries in the region to deal with these risks is to address vulnerabilities caused by past financial and fiscal policies, and complement these measures with structural reforms to enhance export competitiveness,” Sudhir Shetty, the World Bank’s East Asia and Pacific chief economist, said in a statement.
Growth in the region excluding China is expected to accelerate to 5.3 percent in 2015 from 4.8 percent this year as a gradual recovery in high-income economies boosts demand for its exports, and domestic economic reforms advance in the large Southeast Asian economies, the World Bank said.
China’s growth is expected to slow as the government implements policies to address financial vulnerabilities and structural constraints, the World Bank said.
As it seeks to strike a balance between containing risks and meeting growth targets, structural reforms in sectors previously reserved for state enterprises and services could help offset the impact of measures to contain local government debt and curb shadow banking, the report showed.
Protests in Hong Kong will probably slow growth there this year but haven’t so far had a significant impact on China’s economy, Shetty said today.
The World Bank also cut its forecasts for Thailand’s growth this year to 1.5 percent from an earlier estimate of 3 percent. The country’s junta, which seized power about four months ago in a coup, has said it will stop buying farm products directly from growers as state purchases spur overproduction, distort the market and create stockpiles.
The country needs to pursue further fiscal reforms following the scrapping of the rice-pledging scheme and proposals including the revision of property income taxes warrant serious consideration by the new government, the World Bank said.
The world’s growth is forecast to be 2.6 percent growth in 2014, and an average of 3.3 percent from 2015 to 2017, it said.
“In this uncertain global environment, there is still a window of opportunity to enact critical, and in some cases overdue, reforms,” the World Bank said in its report. “The short-term priority in several countries is to address the vulnerabilities and inefficiencies that have been created by an extended period of loose financial conditions and fiscal stimulus.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Sharon Chen in Singapore at schen462@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Stephanie Phang at sphang@bloomberg.net Brett Miller, James Mayger
The region is forecast to grow 6.9 percent in 2014 and 2015, down from 7.1 percent projected in April, the Washington-based lender said in its East Asia and Pacific Economic Update released today. China will expand 7.4 percent this year and 7.2 percent next year, compared with 7.6 percent and 7.5 percent previously forecast, the report showed.
Data released last month showed China’s industrial-output expansion at its weakest since the global financial crisis, while moderating investment and retail sales growth underscore the risks of a deepening economic slowdown led by a slumping property market. Significant uncertainties remain that could affect the region’s growth including downside risks in the euro area and Japan, a sharp tightening in global financial conditions and international and regional geopolitical tensions, the World Bank said.
“The best way for countries in the region to deal with these risks is to address vulnerabilities caused by past financial and fiscal policies, and complement these measures with structural reforms to enhance export competitiveness,” Sudhir Shetty, the World Bank’s East Asia and Pacific chief economist, said in a statement.
Growth in the region excluding China is expected to accelerate to 5.3 percent in 2015 from 4.8 percent this year as a gradual recovery in high-income economies boosts demand for its exports, and domestic economic reforms advance in the large Southeast Asian economies, the World Bank said.
Exports Boost
It raised its forecast for Malaysia’s 2014 growth to 5.7 percent from 4.9 percent in April because of robust exports in the first half, it said. The surge in shipments helped growth in the economy unexpectedly accelerate to the fastest pace in six quarters in the three months through June from a year earlier.China’s growth is expected to slow as the government implements policies to address financial vulnerabilities and structural constraints, the World Bank said.
As it seeks to strike a balance between containing risks and meeting growth targets, structural reforms in sectors previously reserved for state enterprises and services could help offset the impact of measures to contain local government debt and curb shadow banking, the report showed.
Protests in Hong Kong will probably slow growth there this year but haven’t so far had a significant impact on China’s economy, Shetty said today.
Trade Flows
The world’s second-biggest economy was the top trading partner for the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nation’s last year, according to data from the Asean-China Centre.The World Bank also cut its forecasts for Thailand’s growth this year to 1.5 percent from an earlier estimate of 3 percent. The country’s junta, which seized power about four months ago in a coup, has said it will stop buying farm products directly from growers as state purchases spur overproduction, distort the market and create stockpiles.
The country needs to pursue further fiscal reforms following the scrapping of the rice-pledging scheme and proposals including the revision of property income taxes warrant serious consideration by the new government, the World Bank said.
World Outlook
The global economy is showing signs of recovery, albeit at an uneven pace, while significant uncertainties remain regarding the strength and sustainability of the recovery in high-income economies and about the timing of policy actions by central banks in these countries, the World Bank said.The world’s growth is forecast to be 2.6 percent growth in 2014, and an average of 3.3 percent from 2015 to 2017, it said.
“In this uncertain global environment, there is still a window of opportunity to enact critical, and in some cases overdue, reforms,” the World Bank said in its report. “The short-term priority in several countries is to address the vulnerabilities and inefficiencies that have been created by an extended period of loose financial conditions and fiscal stimulus.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Sharon Chen in Singapore at schen462@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Stephanie Phang at sphang@bloomberg.net Brett Miller, James Mayger
China | Economic Forecasts | 2014-2030 Outlook
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/china/forecast
China | Economic Forecasts | 2014-2030 Outlook
Markets | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Currency | 6.13 | 5.97 | 5.5 | 6.13 | 6.06 | 4.5 | 4 | [+] |
Government Bond 10Y | 4.04 | 4.26 | 4.1 | 4 | 4.09 | 4.11 | 4.11 | [+] |
Stock Market | 2374.54 | 2044 | 2119 | 2171 | 2167 | 3000 | 5000 | [+] |
GDP | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
GDP | 9240.27 | 9976 | 10213 | 10446 | 11232 | 15036 | 19729 | [+] |
GDP Growth Rate | 2.00 | 1.95 | 1.56 | 1.52 | 1.48 | 2.95 | 2.95 | [+] |
GDP Annual Growth Rate | 7.50 | 7.58 | 6 | 7.21 | 7.32 | 5 | 4 | [+] |
Gross National Product | 566130.20 | 626388 | 637985 | 649437 | 689757 | 889444 | 1170958 | [+] |
GDP per capita | 3583.38 | 3759 | 3817 | 3875 | 4089 | 5240 | 7379 | [+] |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation | 269075.40 | 302905 | 309600 | 316271 | 336144 | 463392 | 692496 | [+] |
GDP per capita PPP | 11524.57 | 12098 | 12287 | 12477 | 13171 | 16915 | 23834 | [+] |
Labour | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Unemployment Rate | 4.10 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 5.6 | [+] |
Employed Persons | 76977.00 | 77180 | 77248 | 77315 | 78289 | 79964 | 83054 | [+] |
Unemployed Persons | 940.00 | 940 | 939 | 940 | 940 | 940 | 940 | [+] |
Job Vacancies | 5705000.00 | 6180172 | 6048356 | 5677634 | 6001304 | 5738756 | 5735535 | [+] |
Wages | 51474.00 | 54919 | 55977 | 57040 | 60384 | 78929 | 100712 | [+] |
Wages in Manufacturing | 46431.00 | 49938 | 50998 | 52048 | 55736 | 62742 | 27799 | [+] |
Labour Costs | 106.00 | 105 | 105 | 104 | 103 | 97.13 | 93.62 | [+] |
Population | 1360.72 | 1366 | 1361 | 1369 | 1374 | 1406 | 1467 | [+] |
Retirement Age Women | 50.00 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | [+] |
Retirement Age Men | 60.00 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | [+] |
Prices | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Inflation Rate | 2.00 | 1.85 | 1.78 | 1.66 | 1.89 | 3.89 | 3.72 | [+] |
Inflation Rate Mom | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.67 | -0.33 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | [+] |
Consumer Price Index CPI | 102.00 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 103 | 103 | 104 | [+] |
Core Inflation Rate | 1.60 | 1.68 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.59 | 1.61 | 1.61 | [+] |
Core Consumer Prices | 101.60 | 102 | 101 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | [+] |
GDP Deflator | 588.21 | 608 | 609 | 611 | 614 | 626 | 630 | [+] |
Producer Prices | 98.80 | 98.69 | 99.16 | 99.91 | 103 | 103 | 104 | [+] |
Producer Prices Change | -1.20 | -1.13 | -1.07 | -1.01 | 0.12 | 0.38 | 0.62 | [+] |
Export Prices | 98.80 | 97.05 | 97.28 | 97.4 | 98.32 | 98.76 | 99.73 | [+] |
Import Prices | 101.30 | 108 | 109 | 109 | 104 | 106 | 107 | [+] |
Food Inflation | 3.00 | 2.92 | 2.21 | 2.17 | 2.34 | 2.73 | 2.72 | [+] |
Money | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Interest Rate | 6.00 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6.1 | 6.25 | [+] |
Interbank Rate | 5.36 | 5 | 4.74 | 4.48 | 4.69 | 4.66 | 4.1 | [+] |
Money Supply M0 | 5730.00 | 5949 | 5958 | 5908 | 5978 | 6006 | 6065 | [+] |
Money Supply M1 | 33130.00 | 33680 | 34334 | 34479 | 35905 | 39532 | 40988 | [+] |
Money Supply M2 | 119420.00 | 122417 | 125699 | 129211 | 140442 | 207223 | 330669 | [+] |
Central Bank Balance Sheet | 329698.60 | 332412 | 335704 | 339366 | 350524 | 411994 | 483436 | [+] |
Foreign Exchange Reserves | 3993212.72 | 4161527 | 4279852 | 4403844 | 4705143 | 5215767 | 4493118 | [+] |
Banks Balance Sheet | 702.50 | 650 | 659 | 939 | 633 | 633 | 633 | [+] |
Loans to Private Sector | 778259.41 | 777103 | 793077 | 734124 | 707925 | 712988 | 712945 | [+] |
Loan Growth | 13.30 | 13.07 | 12.57 | 12.74 | 13.32 | 13.11 | 13.09 | [+] |
Trade | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Balance of Trade | 498.30 | 381 | 444 | 426 | 521 | 479 | 484 | [+] |
Exports | 2084.65 | 2007 | 2068 | 2011 | 2166 | 2161 | 2204 | [+] |
Imports | 1586.29 | 1626 | 1625 | 1586 | 1639 | 1675 | 1707 | [+] |
Current Account | 722.00 | 508 | 540 | 452 | 525 | 523 | 523 | [+] |
Current Account to GDP | 2.00 | 1.85 | 1.83 | 1.8 | 1.76 | 1.73 | 1.73 | [+] |
External Debt | 8631.67 | 9487 | 9742 | 9982 | 10628 | 13005 | 14029 | [+] |
Terms of Trade | 97.53 | 100 | 101 | 100 | 102 | 101 | 101 | [+] |
Foreign Direct Investment | 783.40 | 780 | 579 | 527 | 586 | 614 | 614 | [+] |
Capital Flows | -369.00 | -126 | -67.41 | -206 | -163 | -15.4 | -1.28 | [+] |
Tourist Arrivals | 167.60 | 176 | 162 | 177 | 163 | 163 | 163 | [+] |
Gold Reserves | 1054.09 | 1054 | 1054 | 1054 | 1054 | 1054 | 1054 | [+] |
Crude Oil Production | 4259.00 | 4219 | 4221 | 4212 | 4206 | 4144 | 4037 | [+] |
Government | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Government Budget | -2.10 | -2.38 | -2.42 | -2.45 | -2.49 | -2.5 | -2.5 | [+] |
Government Debt to GDP | 22.40 | 20.83 | 22.16 | 20.35 | 20.01 | 19.79 | 19.79 | [+] |
Government Budget Value | 2405.40 | -763 | -5356 | -400 | -5433 | -5505 | -5506 | [+] |
Government Spending | 79978.10 | 90522 | 92594 | 94653 | 101766 | 140887 | 207695 | [+] |
Credit Rating | 78.82 | [+] | ||||||
Business | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Business Confidence | 121.40 | 123 | 123 | 124 | 122 | 122 | 122 | [+] |
Manufacturing PMI | 51.10 | 50.73 | 51.33 | 51.27 | 51.3 | 51.29 | 51.29 | [+] |
Services PMI | 53.50 | 53.04 | 51.63 | 53.34 | 52.04 | 52 | 52 | [+] |
Industrial Production | 6.90 | 8.58 | 8 | 7.96 | 8 | 8.12 | 8.13 | [+] |
Industrial Production Mom | 0.20 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.31 | [+] |
Non Manufacturing PMI | 54.00 | 55.02 | 51.83 | 53.7 | 51.97 | 51.98 | 51.98 | [+] |
New Orders | 53.60 | 53.21 | 51.69 | 56.09 | 51.5 | 51.58 | 51.57 | [+] |
Changes in Inventories | 11280.70 | 11450 | 11462 | 11472 | 11488 | 11500 | 11500 | [+] |
Car Registrations | 1357948.00 | 1629654 | 1694896 | 1718299 | 2660059 | 3330337 | 5228261 | [+] |
Corporate Profits | 72003.00 | 69760 | 68420 | 69489 | 69289 | 69483 | 69483 | [+] |
Leading Economic Index | 100.10 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | [+] |
Manufacturing Production | 8.00 | [+] | ||||||
Consumer | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Consumer Confidence | 103.80 | 106 | 107 | 107 | 105 | 105 | 106 | [+] |
Retail Sales MoM | 0.92 | 1 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 | [+] |
Retail Sales YoY | 11.90 | 12.91 | 13.84 | 11.95 | 13.8 | 13.84 | 13.84 | [+] |
Consumer Spending | 212187.50 | 244077 | 249254 | 254393 | 269874 | 369089 | 534208 | [+] |
Disposable Personal Income | 26955.00 | 28731 | 29317 | 29899 | 31945 | 43107 | 62476 | [+] |
Personal Savings | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.1 | 0.05 | [+] |
Bank Lending Rate | 6.00 | 6.05 | 5.94 | 5.93 | 5.93 | 5.94 | 5.94 | [+] |
Consumer Credit | 143557.16 | 147868 | 154109 | 160249 | 179930 | 286204 | 437023 | [+] |
Housing | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Housing Index | 0.50 | 16.32 | 0.32 | -0.2 | 1.23 | 1.98 | 2.01 | [+] |
Taxes | Last | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | 2015 | 2020 | 2030 | |
Corporate Tax Rate | 25.00 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | [+] |
Personal Income Tax Rate | 45.00 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | [+] |
Sales Tax Rate | 17.00 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | [+] |
Social Security Rate | 48.00 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | [+] |
Social Security Rate For Companies | 37.00 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | [+] |
Social Security Rate For Employees | 11.00 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | [+] |
China Economic Forecast 2014 - 2015: Rocky Growth
http://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2014/03/10/china-economic-forecast-2014-2015-rocky-growth/
China Economic Forecast 2014 - 2015: Rocky Growth
Comment Now
Follow Comments
China’s
long-term growth outlook is solid, but there will be rocky times along
the way. Figuring out when those rocky times will hit is difficult.
Businesses involved in China for the long term can be confident of
economic growth, but the company that needs strong sales in one
particular year is much less certain.
In this article we’ll look at the drivers of China’s long-term growth, then address the short-term challenges. I’m not a China expert, but the country is important to some of my clients so I take an outsider’s view of the statistics and stories coming from the country.
First, though, let’s address the question of whether we spend too much time talking about China. China is the second largest economy in the world and the United States’ second-largest export destination. Many commodity-based economies have risen in recent years with China’s growth. Moreover, China’s opportunities and challenges are similar to what other emerging countries are facing, so it’s a bellwether for a larger group of countries.
China’s long-term growth story is fairly simple. In the late 1970s, Deng Xiaoping enacted reforms to allow farmers to cultivate family plots rather than communal farms. He tolerated small entrepreneurs. A migration from poor rural areas to cities with opportunities was ignored though it was illegal. These reforms substantially raised the productivity of poor people in the country. Foreign investment followed, further increasing productivity. Trade with other countries increased, again tolerated by the government. In short, economic reforms allowed poor people to become more productive, and they earned rising incomes.
This story won’t go on forever, but there’s substantial room for further gains. China ranks 93rd in the world on GDP per capita, indicating substantial room for improvement. China’s per capita output would have to grow by 32 percent just to match the current world average. It would have to more than triple to equal the European average. There’s no reason China won’t eventually get close to the output level of the developed world. That will drive above-average growth rates for many years.
The Economist has noted a decline in the number of Chinese who are of working age, caused by the one child policy. The policy began in 1979, so the first wave of only-children is now 39 years old, about halfway through their working years. The Economist calls the phenomenon “peak toil,” but it is less relevant to China than to a developed country such as Japan. In China, increased productivity of existing workers is the huge force, while growth of the total labor force is a relatively small factor.
Although the long-term outlook is positive, the country’s transitions create stumbling blocks. Environmental concerns are one major issue. By some reports, some domestic coal and iron ore is not being used because it’s too dirty; instead, steel and coal are imported. Factories are expected to clean themselves up, with short-term adjustment costs.
The mix between exports and domestic consumption is another
short-term issue. Early on, the great surge of output was for
international markets. Rising incomes have caused a growing consumption
economy, and the transition is not totally smooth.
With rising incomes have come rising real estate prices, leading to a housing boom. Some analysts anticipate a hard landing from the boom, but so far it’s been fairly soft. However, this is another transition that presents an obstacle to a smooth path for the Chinese economy.
Rising wages have also caused a loss of some of the substantial cost advantage that China has had, with additional loss from the rising foreign exchange rate. Some American companies are “re-shoring” their operations. Costs are still lower in China, especially for labor-intensive work, but lower costs don’t always cover higher transportation costs, quality monitoring costs and the economic loss from a longer supply chain.
Chinese consumers are increasingly concerned about the quality of the products they buy, especially after the 2008 contaminated milk scandal. This concern is strongest in food products, but also extends across all locally made products, including apparel and kitchen gadgets. Local companies producing for the local market, however, are used to cutting corners. Chinese companies that produce high quality exports for the likes of Apple are not producing much for their own market. Eventually, companies will match their production to the quality that consumers are willing to buy, but the transition is likely to be ragged.
China’s political leaders understand, or at least give lip service, to the need for further structural reforms, especially in credit allocation. The first default on a bond issue in the country is actually good news in this regard, indicating that problems will not always be swept under the rug. Political leaders have also begun an anti-corruption campaign, which sounds like foxes guarding the chicken coops. Altogether too much cronyism occurs in the nation’s political-economic decisions.
An economy is not really about aggregates such as gross domestic product or industrial production. Actual goods and services are produced and sold to particular consumers, businesses and government departments. A smoothly-functioning economy gets the right goods produced and sold at the right prices. A good economy also adjusts the composition of output to reflect changes in tastes, technology and materials costs. However, the more changes that need to be made, the harder it is to get all of the production and consumption decisions right. China has many changes to make. Their economic system still has too much cronyism and protection of state enterprises, which slow down adjustments.
China is likely to have a pronounced slump in the next few years—but a
temporary slump. Continued smooth growth is simply too much to hope for
in a somewhat-clumsy economy subject to numerous major transitions.
When this slump occurs is impossible to predict. As in the United States, some analysts are always bearish and some always bullish. It’s unlikely that anyone will switch from bull to bear at exactly the right time.
The IMF predicts very gradual deceleration in the coming years, and that’s a fine forecast—if nothing goes wrong. My advice is to plan for long-term growth, but also do contingency planning for a sharp, short-lived recession sometime in the next few years. Just when it will occur, however, I cannot say.
[Updated 7/21/2014 to correct the name of Deng Xiaoping.]
In this article we’ll look at the drivers of China’s long-term growth, then address the short-term challenges. I’m not a China expert, but the country is important to some of my clients so I take an outsider’s view of the statistics and stories coming from the country.
First, though, let’s address the question of whether we spend too much time talking about China. China is the second largest economy in the world and the United States’ second-largest export destination. Many commodity-based economies have risen in recent years with China’s growth. Moreover, China’s opportunities and challenges are similar to what other emerging countries are facing, so it’s a bellwether for a larger group of countries.
China’s long-term growth story is fairly simple. In the late 1970s, Deng Xiaoping enacted reforms to allow farmers to cultivate family plots rather than communal farms. He tolerated small entrepreneurs. A migration from poor rural areas to cities with opportunities was ignored though it was illegal. These reforms substantially raised the productivity of poor people in the country. Foreign investment followed, further increasing productivity. Trade with other countries increased, again tolerated by the government. In short, economic reforms allowed poor people to become more productive, and they earned rising incomes.
This story won’t go on forever, but there’s substantial room for further gains. China ranks 93rd in the world on GDP per capita, indicating substantial room for improvement. China’s per capita output would have to grow by 32 percent just to match the current world average. It would have to more than triple to equal the European average. There’s no reason China won’t eventually get close to the output level of the developed world. That will drive above-average growth rates for many years.
The Economist has noted a decline in the number of Chinese who are of working age, caused by the one child policy. The policy began in 1979, so the first wave of only-children is now 39 years old, about halfway through their working years. The Economist calls the phenomenon “peak toil,” but it is less relevant to China than to a developed country such as Japan. In China, increased productivity of existing workers is the huge force, while growth of the total labor force is a relatively small factor.
Although the long-term outlook is positive, the country’s transitions create stumbling blocks. Environmental concerns are one major issue. By some reports, some domestic coal and iron ore is not being used because it’s too dirty; instead, steel and coal are imported. Factories are expected to clean themselves up, with short-term adjustment costs.
With rising incomes have come rising real estate prices, leading to a housing boom. Some analysts anticipate a hard landing from the boom, but so far it’s been fairly soft. However, this is another transition that presents an obstacle to a smooth path for the Chinese economy.
Rising wages have also caused a loss of some of the substantial cost advantage that China has had, with additional loss from the rising foreign exchange rate. Some American companies are “re-shoring” their operations. Costs are still lower in China, especially for labor-intensive work, but lower costs don’t always cover higher transportation costs, quality monitoring costs and the economic loss from a longer supply chain.
Chinese consumers are increasingly concerned about the quality of the products they buy, especially after the 2008 contaminated milk scandal. This concern is strongest in food products, but also extends across all locally made products, including apparel and kitchen gadgets. Local companies producing for the local market, however, are used to cutting corners. Chinese companies that produce high quality exports for the likes of Apple are not producing much for their own market. Eventually, companies will match their production to the quality that consumers are willing to buy, but the transition is likely to be ragged.
China’s political leaders understand, or at least give lip service, to the need for further structural reforms, especially in credit allocation. The first default on a bond issue in the country is actually good news in this regard, indicating that problems will not always be swept under the rug. Political leaders have also begun an anti-corruption campaign, which sounds like foxes guarding the chicken coops. Altogether too much cronyism occurs in the nation’s political-economic decisions.
An economy is not really about aggregates such as gross domestic product or industrial production. Actual goods and services are produced and sold to particular consumers, businesses and government departments. A smoothly-functioning economy gets the right goods produced and sold at the right prices. A good economy also adjusts the composition of output to reflect changes in tastes, technology and materials costs. However, the more changes that need to be made, the harder it is to get all of the production and consumption decisions right. China has many changes to make. Their economic system still has too much cronyism and protection of state enterprises, which slow down adjustments.
When this slump occurs is impossible to predict. As in the United States, some analysts are always bearish and some always bullish. It’s unlikely that anyone will switch from bull to bear at exactly the right time.
The IMF predicts very gradual deceleration in the coming years, and that’s a fine forecast—if nothing goes wrong. My advice is to plan for long-term growth, but also do contingency planning for a sharp, short-lived recession sometime in the next few years. Just when it will occur, however, I cannot say.
[Updated 7/21/2014 to correct the name of Deng Xiaoping.]
Learn about my economics and business consulting. To get my free monthly newsletter, view a sample, then hit the pink box. I’m a great speaker on the economic outlook, futurist, strategist.
China Economy
http://www.economywatch.com/world_economy/china/
In 2012, China was the 18th fastest growing economy in the world,
with a real GDP growth rate (constant prices, national currency) of 7.8
percent. Although the figure is its slowest growth since 1999, it is
also representative of a maturing economy as it gradually transition
from a developing to developed nation.
Since 1949, the Chinese government has been responsible for planning and managing the national economy. But it was only in 1978 – when Deng Xiaoping introduced capitalist market principles –that the Chinese economy began to show massive growth, averaging 10 percent GDP growth over the last 30 years. During that period the size of the Chinese economy grew by roughly 48 times, from $168.367 billion (current prices, US dollars) in 1981 to $8.227 trillion.
From 2003 to 2010, the Chinese economy experienced near-uninterrupted double-digit growth – with the exception of 2008 and 2009, during the global economic downturn. Nevertheless, the Chinese economy still managed to post respectable growth figures during that period – 9.635 percent and 9.214 percent respectively.
Nonetheless, while its GDP (PPP) is set to overtake that of the US’s, China’s nominal GDP (current prices, US dollars) will still be below that of its rival in 2018. The US’s GDP (current prices) is forecasted to hit $21.101 trillion in five years, significantly higher than China’s $14.911 trillion. Going by current growth rates, it will take another 30-40 years for China to become the world’s largest economy in both GDP (PPP) and GDP (current prices).
Since initiating market reforms in 1978, China has shifted from a centrally planned to a market based economy. More than 600 million citizens have been lifted out of poverty as a result, but over 170 million people still live below the $1.25-a-day international poverty line. In 2012, China’s GDP (PPP) per capita was $12,405.67. This is 37 times higher than what it was just 30 years ago. By 2018, China’s GDP (PPP) per capita will climb from the 90th to 75th highest in the world – at $16,231.50. This however will still be below the forecasted world average of $18,867.17.
Find out more about the Chinese Economic Forecast on the Economy Watch Economic Statistics database.
Nonetheless, the government has in recent years renewed its drive to support state-owned enterprises in sectors it considers important to national economic security – particularly natural resources, banking and telecommunications. In a major push to boost the state sector in 2003, Beijing set up the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission as a watchdog to expand and strengthen large industrial state enterprises.
Consequently SOEs, combined assets rose to 28 trillion yuan ($4.56) 2011 from 7.13 trillion yuan in 2002. Revenues have also soared from 3.36 trillion yuan to 20.2 trillion yuan.
Critics argued that the SOEs are stifling innovation and restricting opportunities for private companies. Though fewer in number than before, as a result of massive state consolidation, today’s SOEs are far more powerful. As of 2012, large state-owned enterprises produced over 50 percent of China’s goods and services and employed over half of the nation’s labour force. 65 of the Chinese SOEs also made it into 2012 Fortune Global 500 list, including State Grid Corporation of China, which operates the country's power grid, and oil companies China National Petroleum Corporation and Sinopec.
The Chinese economy can also be understood as a decentralised collection of several regional economies, with large imbalances between the rural and urban population.
The three wealthiest and most important economic regions are all on the east coast: the Pearl River Delta close to Hong Kong, The Yangtze River Delta surrounding Shanghai and the Bohai Bay region near Beijing. It is the rapid development of these areas that is expected to have the most significant effect on the Asian regional economy as a whole, and Chinese government policy is designed to remove the obstacles to accelerated growth in these wealthier regions.
Over the past two decades however, China has embarked on an ambitious program of expressway network expansion. By facilitating market integration, this program aims both to promote efficiency at the national level and to contribute to the catch-up of lagging inland regions with prosperous Eastern ones.
The consequence of the program saw China’s two major financial centres, Beijing and Shanghai, experience the lowest growth in 2012 – 7.7 percent and 7.5 percent respectively – compared to growth rates of over 13 percent for Tianjin, Chongqing, Guizhou, Yunnan in the more impoverished interior.
Find out more about China Economic Structure on EconomyWatch.com
Since its accession into the WTO in 2001, China‘s share in global trade has doubled – accounting for 10.38 percent of the world’s merchandise trade exports and 9.43 percent of merchandise trade imports.
For many countries around the world, China is rapidly becoming their most important bilateral trade partner. In 2011, they were the largest exporting/importing partner for 32 and 34 countries respectively.
However, there have been concerns over large trade imbalances between China and the rest of the world. The US in particular has the largest trade deficit in the world with China at $315 billion, more than three times what it was a decade ago.
There have also been a growing number of trade disputes brought against, mainly for dumping, unfair subsidies by the Chinese government, intellectual property and the valuation of the yuan. Nonetheless its WTO entry ensures that the country will remain a key figure in international trade.
Domestically, the Chinese government has been keen to reduce the economy’s reliance on exports and focus on internal consumption. In March 2013, China’s new leadership announced that they would move to recalibrate the economy, acknowledging that there is a “growing conflict between downward pressure on economic growth and excess production capacity.”
Find out more about China Exports, Imports & Trade on EconomyWatch.com
Nevertheless, despite the dominance of Industries in the composition of China’s GDP, Services is catching up quickly – and may overtake Industries by the end of the year. In 2012, Services accounted for 44.6 percent of China’s GDP, just 0.7 percentage points behind Industries. Comparatively just three years ago, that gap was 8.1 percentage points wide.
Finally, Agriculture accounted for 10.1 percent of China’s GDP in 2012. The economic reforms introduced in 1978 saw China de-collectivize agriculture, yielding tremendous gains in production as a result.
Today, China is the world's largest producer of agricultural products
- ranking first in the world for rice, wheat, potatoes, sorghum,
peanuts, tea, millet, barley, cotton, oilseed, pork, and fish. About 300
million Chinese are employed in the agriculture sector – making up 34.8
percent of the labour force.
Find out more about China Industry Sectors on EconomyWatch.com
China's economy is growing into multiple new sectors. For example, the eCommerce sectors has been growing, both with large sites such as Alibaba, and with multiple small retailers, such as this site, offering clothes shopping online.
By:
EW World Economy Team
Date:
4 June 2013
China
is the 2nd largest economy in the world according to both GDP (current
prices, US dollars) and GDP (PPP). In 2012, China’s GDP (current prices,
US dollars) was US$8.227 trillion and its GDP (PPP) was US$12.405
trillion.
In 2012, China was the 18th fastest growing economy in the world,
with a real GDP growth rate (constant prices, national currency) of 7.8
percent. Although the figure is its slowest growth since 1999, it is
also representative of a maturing economy as it gradually transition
from a developing to developed nation.Since 1949, the Chinese government has been responsible for planning and managing the national economy. But it was only in 1978 – when Deng Xiaoping introduced capitalist market principles –that the Chinese economy began to show massive growth, averaging 10 percent GDP growth over the last 30 years. During that period the size of the Chinese economy grew by roughly 48 times, from $168.367 billion (current prices, US dollars) in 1981 to $8.227 trillion.
From 2003 to 2010, the Chinese economy experienced near-uninterrupted double-digit growth – with the exception of 2008 and 2009, during the global economic downturn. Nevertheless, the Chinese economy still managed to post respectable growth figures during that period – 9.635 percent and 9.214 percent respectively.
China Economic Forecast
In 2013, its GDP (PPP) is expected to reach $13.623 trillion – or a 9.81 percent increase. Comparatively, China’s GDP (PPP) grew by 9.73 percent from 2011 to 2012. Forecasts for the next five years predict the nation’s GDP (PPP) will grow by an average of 13.24 percent per annum, reaching $22.641 trillion in 2018.Nonetheless, while its GDP (PPP) is set to overtake that of the US’s, China’s nominal GDP (current prices, US dollars) will still be below that of its rival in 2018. The US’s GDP (current prices) is forecasted to hit $21.101 trillion in five years, significantly higher than China’s $14.911 trillion. Going by current growth rates, it will take another 30-40 years for China to become the world’s largest economy in both GDP (PPP) and GDP (current prices).
Since initiating market reforms in 1978, China has shifted from a centrally planned to a market based economy. More than 600 million citizens have been lifted out of poverty as a result, but over 170 million people still live below the $1.25-a-day international poverty line. In 2012, China’s GDP (PPP) per capita was $12,405.67. This is 37 times higher than what it was just 30 years ago. By 2018, China’s GDP (PPP) per capita will climb from the 90th to 75th highest in the world – at $16,231.50. This however will still be below the forecasted world average of $18,867.17.
Find out more about the Chinese Economic Forecast on the Economy Watch Economic Statistics database.
China Economic Profile
China Economic Structure
China has one of the most diverse spread of industrial production in the world, fitting for a country that is called 'The World’s Factory'. Since 1978, the nation has gradually reduced its reliance on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) – though they still account for 46 percent of China’s industrial output, down from 77.6 percent 35 years agoNonetheless, the government has in recent years renewed its drive to support state-owned enterprises in sectors it considers important to national economic security – particularly natural resources, banking and telecommunications. In a major push to boost the state sector in 2003, Beijing set up the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission as a watchdog to expand and strengthen large industrial state enterprises.
Consequently SOEs, combined assets rose to 28 trillion yuan ($4.56) 2011 from 7.13 trillion yuan in 2002. Revenues have also soared from 3.36 trillion yuan to 20.2 trillion yuan.
Critics argued that the SOEs are stifling innovation and restricting opportunities for private companies. Though fewer in number than before, as a result of massive state consolidation, today’s SOEs are far more powerful. As of 2012, large state-owned enterprises produced over 50 percent of China’s goods and services and employed over half of the nation’s labour force. 65 of the Chinese SOEs also made it into 2012 Fortune Global 500 list, including State Grid Corporation of China, which operates the country's power grid, and oil companies China National Petroleum Corporation and Sinopec.
The Chinese economy can also be understood as a decentralised collection of several regional economies, with large imbalances between the rural and urban population.
The three wealthiest and most important economic regions are all on the east coast: the Pearl River Delta close to Hong Kong, The Yangtze River Delta surrounding Shanghai and the Bohai Bay region near Beijing. It is the rapid development of these areas that is expected to have the most significant effect on the Asian regional economy as a whole, and Chinese government policy is designed to remove the obstacles to accelerated growth in these wealthier regions.
Over the past two decades however, China has embarked on an ambitious program of expressway network expansion. By facilitating market integration, this program aims both to promote efficiency at the national level and to contribute to the catch-up of lagging inland regions with prosperous Eastern ones.
The consequence of the program saw China’s two major financial centres, Beijing and Shanghai, experience the lowest growth in 2012 – 7.7 percent and 7.5 percent respectively – compared to growth rates of over 13 percent for Tianjin, Chongqing, Guizhou, Yunnan in the more impoverished interior.
Find out more about China Economic Structure on EconomyWatch.com
China Exports, Imports and Trade
China is the world’s second largest trading nation behind the US – leading the world in exports and coming in second for imports. From 2009-2011 its trade to GDP ratio was 53.1 percent, while its trade per capita was $2,413.Since its accession into the WTO in 2001, China‘s share in global trade has doubled – accounting for 10.38 percent of the world’s merchandise trade exports and 9.43 percent of merchandise trade imports.
For many countries around the world, China is rapidly becoming their most important bilateral trade partner. In 2011, they were the largest exporting/importing partner for 32 and 34 countries respectively.
However, there have been concerns over large trade imbalances between China and the rest of the world. The US in particular has the largest trade deficit in the world with China at $315 billion, more than three times what it was a decade ago.
There have also been a growing number of trade disputes brought against, mainly for dumping, unfair subsidies by the Chinese government, intellectual property and the valuation of the yuan. Nonetheless its WTO entry ensures that the country will remain a key figure in international trade.
Domestically, the Chinese government has been keen to reduce the economy’s reliance on exports and focus on internal consumption. In March 2013, China’s new leadership announced that they would move to recalibrate the economy, acknowledging that there is a “growing conflict between downward pressure on economic growth and excess production capacity.”
Find out more about China Exports, Imports & Trade on EconomyWatch.com
China Industry Sectors
The most dominant sector of China’s economy remains its manufacturing and industries. Despite seeing a 3.3 percentage point drop in its composition of the nation’s GDP, industries still accounted for 45.3 percent of China’s GDP in 2012 – cementing China’s position as the world leader in gross value of industrial output.Nevertheless, despite the dominance of Industries in the composition of China’s GDP, Services is catching up quickly – and may overtake Industries by the end of the year. In 2012, Services accounted for 44.6 percent of China’s GDP, just 0.7 percentage points behind Industries. Comparatively just three years ago, that gap was 8.1 percentage points wide.
Finally, Agriculture accounted for 10.1 percent of China’s GDP in 2012. The economic reforms introduced in 1978 saw China de-collectivize agriculture, yielding tremendous gains in production as a result.
Find out more about China Industry Sectors on EconomyWatch.com
China's economy is growing into multiple new sectors. For example, the eCommerce sectors has been growing, both with large sites such as Alibaba, and with multiple small retailers, such as this site, offering clothes shopping online.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)